Remove this ad


Jun 3 15 2:28 PM

Tags : :

My Osprey on Pike and Shot tactics runs from 1590 to 1660, running form the Dutch reforms at one end to the Peace of the Pyrenees at the other.  

I have always thought that another set of "horse and musket" rules would cover the War of the Spanish Succession and the Seven Years War.

Where should the dividing line between the two periods be set?  Dare we pick a specific year?

The other spect of scope is geographical area.  I'd love to include the Poles and Ottomans if possible...

Best, Simon
Quote    Reply   
Remove this ad
Remove this ad

#1 [url]

Jun 4 15 9:29 PM

Hi Simon,
I think the spread of years you have noted (from the Dutch to a bit past the 30YW is sound. Much later and pike become supplanted by bayonet armed musketeers and doctrinal change already anticipates the elimination of pike prior to their final replacement. Adding the Poles, Russians (Muscovy) and the Ottomans would be appropriate and expected, I should think.

Quote    Reply   

#2 [url]

Jun 5 15 1:57 AM

Thanks Chris

The introduction of the socket bayonet in the 1670s/80s could make an interesting and logical end point... hmmm.   Also the English and Germans discarded pikes around 1697, and I don't really want to have to take account of pikes in a future set of "Age of Reason" rules.  

Best, Simon

Quote    Reply   

#3 [url]

Jun 5 15 2:09 AM

Hi Simon,

You might want to think of joining the Pike and Shot Society. There has been an interesting debate about when the pike went out of use in it's magazine "The Arquebusier". It seems in full use during the wars of the 1680s and 1690s, and the British do not appear to have abandoned it until after Blenheim. Plus, of course, the Swedes seem to use it in the Great Northern War. Nothing is simple, eh?!

Last Edited By: Mollinary Jun 5 15 2:11 AM. Edited 1 time.

Quote    Reply   

#4 [url]

Jun 5 15 7:25 AM

Hi Mollinary,

You are right- nothing is simple. It's not just about when the pike was abandoned, but at which point the number fielded made them insignificant from a rules point of view. It may be that I run the period of these rules up to 1700 or so, and perhaps overlap them (slightly) with a future Horse and Musket Set.

I will have a look at the Pike and Shot society, thanks for the suggestion!

Best, Simon

Quote    Reply   

#5 [url]

Jan 7 16 3:10 PM

The pike and shot periods

I've been playing, reading, researching, this period for a long time. The traditional split, based on weaponry, is late 15th to late 17th century. I think that is wrong.

I think the first period starts in the last quarter of the 15th century, and is fundamentally medieval. By that, I mean the nature of the armies, the control exercised on the battlefield, the planning and execution of campaigns, is basically medieval. In the first quarter of the 16th century, the Spanish developed the Colunella, the first example of modern combined arms use, and set the theme for the period through to the end of the third quarter. They of course developed the Tercio from the Colunella, but apart from organizing larger administrative units, there may have been no actual tactical change.

So the first period is a hundred years, and is medieval with some form of capability for combined arms operations. Pikes and shot working in unison, groups of small units of pike, or shot, or pike and shot, moving together on the same command, interpenetrating, exchanging in the same or parallel squares. Cavalry with some capability to be assisted by small shot units (limited to Hugenots), and possibly assisted by mounted shot units.

The second period kicks of in the last quarter of the 16th century, with the Dutch formalising (heresy alert) the ad-hoc Spanish system, and influencing a period of change that lasts to the end of the TYW. This period is typified by formal blocks of pike and shot, varing in size, but basically pike in the middle with a sleeve of shot on each side. The armies have more formal systems of control, with battlefield command structures reflecting what has been established for a campaign, and possibly multiple campaigns.
This period needs to represent the "Dutch System" as it developed, and the off-spring of that system, primarily the Swedish but also the Imperial/Spanish. Units of combined pike and shot work together with other units of combined pike and shot, while there needs to be some flexibility to allow seconded shot to work independently with cavalry, or on their own.

The third period kicks of at the end of the TYW and is effectively the growth of linear warfare. The second and third lines of the Spanish army at Rocroi were German auxilliaries with minimal or no pike. They had been raised from garrisons, and reflected reasonably stable units because they had been in garrison for so long. Apart from the Swedes, most European armies would have formed up in some sort of "Dutch System" formation, but with less depth, and focussed on fire power. The Swedes would add the head long charge to this, and appear to have been quite successful until the rest of the European armies developed a fire system that stopped them. Or there just weren't enough Swedes left to keep it going.

The most common feature of the period, is change. Different types of change, and primarily based on how the armies worked, not what the soldiers did. This is not an easy period to develop rules for, but it will certainly be an interesting challenge.

Quote    Reply   
Add Reply

Quick Reply

bbcode help